Archive for February, 2010

Today

Friday, February 12th, 2010

today

House Democrats' health care solution — under construction

Saturday, February 6th, 2010

I frequently hear that the Republican party is the party of “no” when it comes to solving the health care problem. Well, let’s review the situation in Washington.

The House Republicans have a 10-step plan that has been on their website for many months. They have introduced a bill for each of the 10 steps. Unfortunately, with one exception, none of the bills have ever made it out of committee. Apparently the legislator most responsible for leaving these bills languishing in committee is Representative Eileen Cody, Chair of the House Health Care and Wellness Committee.

The House Democrat’s plan? It’s “under construction” according to their website as of February 6th. (See screen shot below.)

Here is the irony, the only bill in the House Republicans’ Plan that has made it out of committee was HB 1383. Signed by Governor Gregoire into law in 2006, it allows the state to offer health savings accounts to state employees. According to Representative Doug Ericksen, a primary author of the House Republicans’ 10-step plan, the administration has refused to implement it, laying the blame to an incompatible computer system among other things. So four years and still no health savings account option for state employees.

I asked Ericksen what, if anything, is likely to get done this legislative session on health care. Not a lot it appears. He said a bill that will put more pressure on the administration to implement health savings accounts for state employees has made it out of committee.

The only other health care-related bill that has made it out of committee is HB 3015, which would authorize the Insurance Commissioner to enter into compacts with other states to permit the sale of small group health benefit plans across state lines. Ericksen says this is fine as far as it goes, but is too lenient in his view, since it is only optional. He would prefer to see a more forceful bill.

Here is the screen shot from the House Democrats’ website as of February 6th, 2010:

The slow squeeze of public sector employment

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

Mayor McGinn’s difficulty in cutting senior staff reminds us why growth in government jobs should be resisted in the first place.   We are dismayed to see the rapid increase in federal employees under the Obama administration.  From a WSJ editorial on the subject:

“Civilian full-time equivalent employees,” as they’re known in budgetese, held relatively constant before Mr. Obama came to Washington, but they surged to 1.978 million in 2009 from 1.875 million in 2008. In fiscal 2010, the Administration expects to add another 170,000 workers—a 14.5% leap in two years.

I guess this explains why United Van Lines moved nearly seven families to Washington D.C. last year for every three it moved out.  The average federal worker, according to USA Today,  makes something like $70,000, while the wage of the average private worker — the ones who support federal workers — is about $40,000.  This trend is marching us along the path to poverty.

Update: WSJ cites U.S. Department of Labor statistics that show that unionized public sector workers now outnumber unionized private sector employees. We’re becoming Europe.