I received a postcard a few days ago that screamed “Why is Whole Foods CEO fighting progressive health care reform?” It was from an organization called Health Care for America Now and it warned me that Whole Foods is looking to locate in my neighborhood soon. I had the urge to look over my shoulder for lurking real estate executives in trench coats, scoping out sites for the new store.
The reference was to CEO John Mackey’s Op-Ed in the Wall Street Journal where he dared to suggest that, even though “we clearly need health reform,” we should be moving “toward less government control and more individual empowerment.”
The postcard wailed, “[Mackey] went so far as to say that health care is not a right in America.” Silly Mr. Mackey. He must have mistook the very debate he was participating in as evidence that there is no right to health care in America (other than the right to be treated in emergency rooms regardless of ability to pay, which every person in American has by statute).
Health Care for America Now’s website urges people to “get angry,” and lists the lies (yes lies!) that are being told about proposed health care reforms. To my horror I realized I am one of the lying liars who tell them since I believe there is a pretty good argument for several of the propositions on their lie list. And forgive my mendacity for not agreeing that “health care reform will be fully paid for,” that “a majority of reform will be paid for by finding savings and cutting waste within the current system,” or that “nothing in any health reform bill being proposed . . . would ration care,” all propositions that are “The Truth” according to Health Care for America Now’s web site.
Is anyone else sick of this manner of debate? There are gross examples of this same poor behavior on the right. Let’s not waste more valuable debating capital arguing about who started it. I don’t know a conservative person (or anyone for that matter) who doesn’t believe that the government has a role in ensuring that everyone has health care, including assisting those with low incomes and catastrophic/chronic diseases. Everyone recognizes that rising prices must be checked. No one favors continuing the status quo. The debate is about how we get there, and it should be an honest one about the trade-offs.
Don’t we all aspire to live in a world where objectively presented facts and thoughtful argument carry the day? One ought to be able to put forward a reasoned argument in good faith without being subject to thinly-veiled boycott campaigns. What do you say we turn our ears from the shrill voices, hold up and engage the reasoned ones.
See John Mackey’s more complete statement of his proposal on his blog here, and his weekend interview with the Wall Street Journal here.